Home > Children & The Law > Smacking Your Children

Smacking Your Children

Author: Lorna Elliott LLB (hons), Barrister - Updated: 12 May 2012 |
 
Law Smack Child Discipline Assault

You may already know that it is illegal for a teacher to smack your child. But a change in the law will mean that they are able to use 'reasonable force' to restrain children if they are being disruptive, committing a crime, harming someone or damaging something. The changes will also give teachers a new general right to search children on school premises. This is in order to search for anything banned by the school.

Smacking Your Own Child

It is not illegal for a parent to hit their child as long as the ‘smack’ amounts to ‘reasonable punishment’. There is, therefore, a difference between punishment and what can feasibly be termed ‘abuse’. Unreasonable punishment is classed as a smack that leaves a mark on the child, or the use of an implement to hit the child, such as a belt or cane. A parent can give another person consent to use reasonable punishment on their child, such as a babysitter or grandparent.

Criminal Offences

So where do you draw the line between assault – a criminal offence – and reasonable punishment? And what happens if the discipline is seen as Child Cruelty in criminal legal terms? Common assault is chargeable by the Crown Prosecution Service if it amounts to scratches, minor bruising, grazes, red skin, a black eye or superficial cuts.

Actual bodily harm could be a broken or lost tooth, broken nose, minor cuts (more than merely superficial), a loss of consciousness, serious bruising, or minor bone fractures, as well as emotional damage that amounts to a psychiatric injury.

Grievous bodily harm requires a compound fracture, injuries that cause a substantial amount of blood loss (requiring a transfusion), a visual disfigurement, injuries that result in permanent disability, or ‘wounding’ that breaks both the inner and outer layers of the skin. Again, this could include psychiatric injury.

Grievous bodily harm with intent is the most serious (before attempted murder) and carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. This would be the right charge if a parent wounded their child with intent, unlawfully, maliciously and intentionally, or caused grievous bodily harm to another person.

Will Smacking Be Banned?

The NSPCC and other children’s charities have been rigorously campaigning for a total ban on smacking. This has not yet come in to force and is unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future. It would also be very hard to enforce within private homes, and reinforces recent government criticism about the ‘nanny state’. Views are divided, but critics of the current law say that it violates the rights of a child not to have recourse to having suffered an assault.

You might also like...
Leave a Comment...
"Unreasonable punishment is classed as a smack that leaves a mark on the child, or the use of an implement to hit the child, such as a belt or cane." I wrote to Law and Parents last year pointing out that I believe this statement is not factual, but have had no response. As I understand, it is only true in Scotland, since October 2003. In the UK, The Children Act 2004, section 58 specifies that the defence of "reasonable punishment" cannot be used in cases where ABH, GBH or cruelty are involved but makes no mention of the use or otherwise of an implement for punishment. There have been subsequent attempts to tighten the law further but none of these have been enacted. As the articles on the site are "written by highly trained family law experts" I am sure you have a high concern to present legal facts correctly and would be pleased to hear if there was room for improvement in one of your articles. I trust you will either change the wording or point out where I am wrong if that is the case.
Jack - 12-May-12 @ 5:34 PM
"Unreasonable punishment is classed as a smack that leaves a mark on the child, or the use of an implement to hit the child, such as a belt or cane." I wrote to Law and Parents last year pointing out that I believe this statement is not factual, but have had no response. As I understand, it is only true in Scotland, since October 2003. In the UK, The Children Act 2004, section 58 specifies that the defence of "reasonable punishment" cannot be used in cases where ABH, GBH or cruelty are involved but makes no mention of the use or otherwise of an implement for punishment. There have been subsequent attempts to tighten the law further but none of these have been enacted. As the articles on the site are "written by highly trained family law experts" I am sure you have a high concern to present legal facts correctly and would be pleased to hear if there was room for improvement in one of your articles. I trust you will either change the wording or point out where I am wrong if that is the case.
Jack - 12-May-12 @ 5:33 PM
Leave a Comment or Ask a Question...
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Notify:
  Notify me by email when a response is posted
Validate:
Enter word:
Latest Comments
  • Shell
    Re: Understanding Parental Responsibility
    I have shared parental responsibility with my sons father but he doesn't live with us and doesn't really bother with…
    18 June 2013
  • trudy
    Re: Understanding Residence Orders
    my daughters boyfriend is threatening legal action. she is 18 & has a 10 wk old daughter,her &her daughter live with me & my…
    16 June 2013
  • lochness
    Re: The Rights of Working Parents
    the company i work for has change it,s retail hours and expects single parents or parents to work to 9pm ...is there a…
    13 June 2013
  • Rimmer
    Re: Contact Orders & How They Affect Parents
    Hi what are the visiting rights as being separated I want to see my children every weekend but have been told…
    30 May 2013
  • titchy
    Re: Changing a Child's Surname
    If me an my babys dad aint married can i change her last name to mi n e without permision from him?because she has his last namehe…
    26 May 2013
  • mand
    Re: Single Parents' Rights
    I am a single mother with two children I have a monthly mortgage of £600 per month besides other benefits such as tax credit which I am…
    24 May 2013
  • Hannah
    Re: Regulations On The Home Schooling Of Your Child
    At present I don't have children but am beginning to plan having a family. I plan to leave work and begin…
    17 May 2013
  • Jacko
    Re: Applying for Child Custody
    i was born in England, i met a Greek lady she moved over to England we got married in England and had our first child in England, …
    13 May 2013
  • scoobie
    Re: School Exclusions and the Law
    My daughter was excluded and I was told by phone for bullying but could not give me any information this was on the Thursday I…
    4 May 2013
Further Reading...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the LawAndParents website. Please read our Disclaimer.