"In loco parentis" is Latin for "in the place of a parent". In English law it describes the duty of care an adult takes on when looking after someone else's child, for example a teacher, childminder or club leader, without gaining full legal parental status.
What does 'in loco parentis' actually mean?
'In loco parentis' is Latin for 'in the place of a parent'. In English law, it describes the responsibility certain adults take on when looking after someone else's child. The person standing in loco parentis temporarily assumes some duties that would normally fall to the child's parent or legal guardian.
While historically significant in English common law, the concept's modern application is more nuanced. Child protection law in England and Wales now operates primarily through statutory frameworks centred on 'duty of care' and 'safeguarding' obligations, as established by the Children Act 1989 and subsequent legislation.
The doctrine does not give someone full legal parental status. It does not allow them to make major medical decisions or consent to marriage on a child's behalf. It creates a framework of responsibility that allows adults to exercise reasonable care and control over children in their charge.

Check your legal rights as a parent on education, health and welfare decisions.
Try our Parental Rights Checker free, here on this site →When does someone act in loco parentis?
This principle applies in various common situations:
- Teachers and school staff assume a duty of care during school hours and activities, now primarily governed by Keeping Children Safe in Education and specific safeguarding laws.
- Childminders, nursery workers and crèche staff have legal duties while children are in their care, whether the setting is registered with Ofsted or operates informally.
- Holiday club supervisors, sports coaches and activity leaders take on this responsibility during organised activities.
- Babysitters, whether paid or unpaid, assume responsibility while looking after children.
- Family members and friends who look after children, even informally, may have duties of care during that time.
The principle can also apply if you take other people's children on an outing, or a friend's child comes to your house to play. The key factor is that the parent has entrusted their child to your care, either explicitly or by implication. The responsibility begins when the child comes into your care and ends when they return to their parent or another authorised person.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
What responsibilities come with this role?
Taking on care of a child creates a duty of care. You must take reasonable steps to ensure their safety and wellbeing while they are in your charge.
The standard expected is that of a reasonable parent. You do not need to guarantee nothing will ever go wrong. Children fall over, have disagreements and occasionally hurt themselves. What matters is whether you took reasonable precautions and responded appropriately.
The duty includes:
- Providing adequate supervision appropriate to the child's age and the activity
- Taking reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm
- Responding appropriately if the child becomes ill or injured
- Not exposing the child to unnecessary risks
- Acting in the child's best interests when making decisions
The level of care required varies with circumstances. A teacher supervising a chemistry practical needs different precautions than one overseeing a reading session. A childminder with toddlers needs closer supervision than someone caring for older children.
Someone with care of a child may exercise reasonable discipline and control, but not physical punishment. Since 2022, the defence of reasonable chastisement has been abolished in Wales. In England, the defence remains but is very limited, with ongoing discussions about similar reforms.
Legal framework and practical points
The Children Act 1989 is the main legislation governing child welfare in England and Wales, establishing that the child's welfare is the paramount consideration. Section 3(5) states that a person without parental responsibility but with care of a child may do what is reasonable to safeguard or promote the child's welfare.
The Children Act 2004 strengthened the statutory framework, placing duties on local authorities to safeguard children. The Education Act 2002 requires maintained schools to make arrangements to safeguard pupils, with similar duties applying to academies and independent schools.
For childcare providers, the Childcare Act 2006 sets out registration, inspection and standards requirements. Ofsted oversees most childcare provision in England; Care Inspectorate Wales performs a similar role in Wales. If someone with care of a child fails in their duty and a child is harmed, they may face civil liability for negligence or, in serious cases, criminal consequences.
If you regularly look after other people's children, communication with parents helps: knowing about allergies, medical conditions, or specific needs means you can care for the child properly. Professional childcarers must usually register with Ofsted or Care Inspectorate Wales, though some exemptions exist. The GOV.UK website has guidance on registration requirements.
Insurance matters too. Childcare businesses need public liability insurance. Even for informal arrangements, check whether your home insurance covers accidents involving visitors. Schools and childcare settings should have clear policies on administering medication, medical emergencies, and uncollected children.
Please help how can we take it far as even corruption erupted the school.
My children are very mature and I have always walked to school with them.
My 10yr old wanted me to sign school forms to say she’s can walk to and from school by herself which I did as she is more than capable of. In the past few weeks all three older kids asked if they can start having more responsibility and taking the 10 minute walk to school which includes all main roads. I would let the three leave the house 5 minutes ahead of me and leave after with the 7 year old. Same thing after school. They have their own key so they walk ahead and go home. Recently I’ve been letting the seven year old hold hands with the ten year old and ahead go ahead on me both before and after school.
They are loving the independence.
On a few occasions over the past two weeks I let them go it alone for 2/3 days of the week.
They love it, we’ve discussed safety procedures and I’ve given my eldest daughter a mobile phone for emergencies. I have another parent get them out of class. Walk them across the road and they are on their way. The level on maturity has changed so much that the teacher of my ten yr old approached me and said my daughter has changed and become even more mature and well grounded. I do believe it’s down to this. They are amazing. I did follow them a few times just to make sure without their knowledge but all was well.
Yesterday the headteacher stopped the other parent who gets them from class and crosses the road with them, and took my children from her claiming that she heard my children walk home by themselves and this is not allowed. She took my children into the school office and called to say that she has them. I told her that It’s my choice that they walk home and I couldn’t understand why she was allowed to take them away from the other authorised person. She said that she would not let them leave. I arrived within 10 minutes of the call as police was leaving the building.
I was told that I must have a meeting with the headteacher and deputy head now or they will take procedures against me.
I asked them if they believed my children were in danger, they said no so I said I had no meeting arranged therefor I am leaving with my children. They used the threat of procedures again.
Am I doing anything illegally or neglectful is my question and when does the duty of the school (loco parentis) finish. It is at the school gate?
Thank you
I was shocked that a stranger could approach my two girls in the school playground whilst staff were there (the school staff did not see what happened). Regardless of what thus mother said to my girls, if felt like my kids did not have anyone to stand on their side. It turns out that the boy lied about my girls hitting him and in actual fact he was hitting my youngest daughter.
I now feel that I should wait with my kids in the car until the school bell rings at 9am. That stranger could have behaved worse than that or it makes me feel that any person can approach my kids in the school playground.
What responsibilities does the school have in this situation and what should be done about it. I live in the UK.
We recently advised our son to sit a lesson out and go to the library as he was shouted at for something he did not do and teacher told him he was not to come back to her class until his apologized.
Our son sat out lesson as we instructed and he has been sanctioned and we have been told we as parents have no rights to influence what our son does whilst at school.
With thanks
Andrew Hall
Can I add: that the school placed my son in isolation for over and hour, with a pen. Self harmers do tend to use whatever they can access, and there apears to have been no thought as to what might have happened whilst my son was alone. He told me yesterday about this. Also, the school did not phone to tell my husband that he was being exluded, but to advise he was to stay home the next day. At the end of school time, my son was released, again unsupervised - there was no attempt to detain him until an adult could collect him. My husband was not asked to collect him during the call. I feel there was a complete lack of belief in my sons disclosure of self harm - the reason he had the knife in school in the first place. There was a letter sent to the school last july from my sons consultant to confirm that he had anxiety and anger issues - none of this has been acknowledged by the school and no assistance has been offered, ever. There has been uproar about the safety of the other child, but not one mention about the schools duty of care to my son.
My mother doesn't always abide by this. He started going beavers I was pleased about this and agreed for this to happen on our day Wednesday (not that she has any respect for my rights as a mother anyway ) Now he goes cubs on a Tuesday as this is the the step from beavers but refuses my day back. But this was legal set up. She breaks the contract whenever she wants and uses my son as a weapon to punish me when she don't get her own way. I find myself apologising just to keep the peace quite often when I'm not in the wrong because she stops me seeing him. I've heard her on a few occasions threatening to sting my son's legs and calling him names which isn't healthy for his self esteem. In her world she thinks I have no rights what can I do.
He is awaiting a referral to counselling services, and though regarded as an urgent case no date has yet been set.
Last week he was rushed into hospital with severe intestinal pain, which revealed a new major blockage, and he has been put back on the Movicol regime.
My daughter has contacted the school to explain the implications, but his class teacher has said that he cannot cope with the increased potential for him soiling himself. My daughter has had a brief conversation with the Headteacher to seek the reintroduction of the classroom support, but he insists that he requires 'evidence' before he is prepared to seek additional funding for help in the classroom.
Can you advise on the position, as she finds it difficult to understand the stance adopted by the school as they have been fully aware of his medical history for four years. She is in the process of obtaining documentary evidence from both consultants, but this will obviously take some time to gather.
Does the school have a legal obligation to cater for his immediate medical needs under the notion of 'in loco parentis', with a duty of care as outlined in the Children Act 1989 and the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
Are they failing in safeguarding her when they did nothing about it ?
12 year old son and friend are playing with other boys. Boy X approaches and verbally insults my son who tells him to go away. Boy X returns with the branch of a tree and threatens my son by thrusting the branch in my son's face. My son grabs the branch and throws it away and fends himself off from Boy X. My son's friend attempts to hold back Boy X. The boys disperse and Boy X then charges my son down to the ground. At this point a teacher is sort out.
Response of School: I am unsure what punishment has been dealt to Boy X, my son has been put in a withdrawal room (exclusion from lessons) for 6 sessions, his friend for 3. The events and the punishments planned have not been discussed with the parents.
me and 3 of my friends are hanging out at my house 2:00 AM.
2 friends are 17, 1 is 18
we decide to go to the store to get some food in a car.
can the 18 year old adopt loco parentis and we not get In trouble for being out pass curfew, if say the 18 year old driver were to get pulled over.
The following day they took her to the slopes again and she had another accident, falling again on the damaged wrist. Her instructor advised the teachers to take my daughter to the medical facility which was on site, but they refused. One teacher told her it couldn't be broken as it wasn't swollen enough.
My daughter then had to endure a 22 hour journey home.
I am still so angry as I have heard nothing from the school except one telephone call in response to my voicemail message. The teacher who was in charge of the trip could offer no explanation as to why nobody had sought any medical assistance for my daughter who ended up in great pain for more than two days.
I am not angry that my daughter broke her wrist, I am angry that the school neglected their duty of care towards my daughter and sem to be trying to ignore the whole situation.
Any comments gratefully received.
I am employed as a bus driver taking children with learning difficulties to and from school.
On entering the school grounds, at what point are the children the responsibility, under the terms of "in loco parentis" of the school as quite often the children are left sitting on the bus until a teacher arrives to collect them (sometimes up to 15 minutes).
In the same vein, the school day finishes at 15:15 but some of the children may not be brought to the bus until 15:30. This often causes the other children waiting on the bus to become stressed out.
If the teachers responsibilities end at the end of school hours are they showing adequate care for the children who are left waiting?
P.S. Is the children s escort on the bus under the same tems of "in loco parentis whilst the children are on the bus?
On the 20th October my 5 year old son had a diarrhoea accident in his P.E class. He soiled his whole bottom half and the faeces were in is shoes.
There were two teachers present and neither one of them accompanied my son or helped him.
No one called me to inform me what had happened.
My son was handed to me with a bag with his Pe Kit in it and I began asking the class teacher questions as to what happened. My son has never pooed himself before and I was curious.
I asked her if she had changed him and how bad it was and what time it happened? She said in p.e and no one helped him. In shock and anger I asked "well how did my 5 year old clean himself up" I was told on his own... I asked "did you
Give him wipes or tissue?" And again I was told no!
I asked why no one had called me she said because it was the last lesson of the day!
I went straight to the front desk and asked to see the safeguarding teacher to find out exactly why no one had phoned me. No one in the officer was aware of the incident.
My question is , is this negligence for a teacher to leave a child like this?
I have a meeting today at 4pm that I have requested for over 3 weeks and asked to speak to the head teacher and I was told I couldn't speak to the head teacher without a solicitor!!
My son hasn't been apologised to and I still have to take him in to be taught by this teacher that didn't look after him
act of 1989 provides that they have a 'duty of care towards the children
under their care as well as promoting their safety and welfare.
In this particular case there is a dereliction of duty on the teachers
behalf.
Would you please enlighten me of what action if any,I can take.
My grandson is happy in this creche and the teachers say they do not
know who did the biting.
Should this ,at least constitute an investigation into who did the biting?
Ask Law and Parents a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.